Hinton v. Don't Run Out, Inc. d/b/a Public Goods

Defendant: Public Goods
Subscription servicesAuto-renewal
CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
Case Number2:26-cv-06654
FiledJune 18, 2026
StatusPending

What this case is about

This lawsuit was filed against Public Goods, a consumer goods company that sells household and personal care products, primarily through a membership-based model. The plaintiff, Hinton, alleges that Public Goods engaged in improper practices related to its subscription or membership program, likely involving automatic renewal charges that were not adequately disclosed to customers. The lawsuit suggests that consumers were signed up for recurring charges without clear notice or proper consent, resulting in unexpected fees on their accounts. The proposed class would likely include customers who signed up for a Public Goods membership or subscription and were subsequently charged recurring fees without receiving adequate prior disclosure about the automatic renewal terms and conditions.

What happens next

The case is in its earliest stage. The defendant has not yet responded. Class certification — the court's decision on whether the case can proceed as a class action — typically takes 12 to 24 months after filing.

Source: CourtListener docket entry. This summary was generated automatically and may not reflect subsequent filings.

Were you affected?

A participating attorney may be able to evaluate your claim at no cost to you.

Attorney advertising. Not a referral service. Submissions are forwarded to a participating plaintiffs' firm.