Washington v. Driscoll's, Inc.

Defendant: Driscoll's
Food & beverageFalse advertising
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
Case Number3:26-cv-06961
Filed
StatusPending
Illustration for Washington v. Driscoll's, Inc.

What this case is about

Consumers are suing Driscoll's, one of the largest berry distributors in the United States, alleging that the company made misleading claims about its products on packaging and in marketing materials. The plaintiffs contend that Driscoll's misrepresented the nature, quality, or sourcing of its berries in ways that deceived reasonable shoppers into purchasing the products or paying more than they otherwise would have. The lawsuit was originally filed in state court and removed to federal court based on the diversity of citizenship between the parties. The proposed class is expected to include consumers across one or more states who purchased Driscoll's branded berry products during a specified time period and were allegedly harmed by the company's misleading representations.

What happens next

The case is in its earliest stage. The defendant has not yet responded. Class certification — the court's decision on whether the case can proceed as a class action — typically takes 12 to 24 months after filing. See our FAQ for how class actions work and what it means to be a class member.

Source: CourtListener docket entry. This summary was generated automatically from the public docket and has not been reviewed by an attorney. It may contain errors and may not reflect subsequent filings. Published by Access Law Group; responsible attorney Bogdan Enica, Esq..

Were you affected?

An attorney may be able to evaluate your claim at no cost to you.

Attorney advertising. Not a referral service. Your information goes to Access Law Group and may be shared with co-counsel. See our privacy policy.